![]() ![]() 6 For further information see infra, , [Borga, Freguglia (.)ĦIn this article, first we present the Cantorian attempt to show the unacceptability of the infinitesimal notion.In fact real numbers are based on the Dedekind axiom and it is well known that:Īrchimedes Post. The inverse is an infinity: 1/ (1/ n ) = n| n =∞ = ∞.ģWe will define below the notion of the actual infinitesimal.ĤTo understand the notion of infinitesimal we must take into account the concept of real numbers. ![]() E.g., a potential infinitesimal is 1/n |n=∞. Infinitesimals and infinities naturally occur in any description of the infinity. The infinitesimal can be seen as its reciprocal. ĢOnce the infinite number is accepted as an infinity, this number does not stay in R. ![]() But they will only believe in the infinitely small with difficulty, despite the fact that the infinitely small has the same right to existence as the infinitely large. A majority of educated people will admit an infinite in space and time, and not just an “unboundedly large”. A belief in the infinitely small does not triumph easily. The infinitely small is a mathematical quantity and has all its properties in common with the finite. On that subject, Paul du Bois-Reymond wrote: A potentially very small magnitude can be generated through the principle according to which given a magnitude there is always a smaller one (see Archimedes’ postulate). 4 Likewise, we can state concerning the infinitesimals. For Aristotle the actual infinity cannot be accepted, and this conception prevailed until the nineteenth century. 3 So, for instance, in Euclidean geometry, a half-straight line is generated by applying the first and second Euclidean postulates. The potential infinite is conceived as something to which it is always possible to add a certain quantity, while the actual infinite is the possibility of instantly imagining a collection, a whole that has no end. At first we think it is useful to outline the distinction between actual infinite and potential infinite, according to the classical tradition. 2 Mathematicians who were interested in the foundations of mathematics often had different opinions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |